<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supposition: why multiple intelligence theory can be vital for a happy marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/</link>
	<description>The true Powers of a woman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tatushka55</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-17206</link>
		<dc:creator>tatushka55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 13:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-17206</guid>
		<description>I am very glad to hear this.
I think I guessed your happyness from your posts.
Wish you more ten years of love with your beloved husband :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very glad to hear this.<br />
I think I guessed your happyness from your posts.<br />
Wish you more ten years of love with your beloved husband <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axinia</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-17173</link>
		<dc:creator>axinia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-17173</guid>
		<description>yes, I am happily married since 4 years :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, I am happily married since 4 years <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tatushka55</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-17172</link>
		<dc:creator>tatushka55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-17172</guid>
		<description>axinia


are you married?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>axinia</p>
<p>are you married?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personality tests &#171; 1000petals&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-16893</link>
		<dc:creator>Personality tests &#171; 1000petals&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-16893</guid>
		<description>[...] second favorite is the Multiple Intelligence Test, which I used for my marriage theory in an earlier post. Multiple Intelligences is Howard Gardner&#8217;s psychological theory(1983) about people and their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] second favorite is the Multiple Intelligence Test, which I used for my marriage theory in an earlier post. Multiple Intelligences is Howard Gardner&#8217;s psychological theory(1983) about people and their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axinia</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-16815</link>
		<dc:creator>axinia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-16815</guid>
		<description>Doung, many thanks for your comment - I am glad you like the theory and  - what is even better - that your expiereience proves it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doung, many thanks for your comment &#8211; I am glad you like the theory and  &#8211; what is even better &#8211; that your expiereience proves it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-16812</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-16812</guid>
		<description>Opposites may attract as some say but being cruious about someone who is very differnt than you are and becoming infatuated is much different than suggestng taht they would be a compatible mate.  Variety is good though.  Through our differences as lovers we can take each other to new places, expand our imaginations and the depth of our connections with each other.

As for same dominant intelligences being compatible, I would agree with you axinia.  You can add me and my wife to your list. And I think the reason may be in the ideals that our intelligence places the most value on, in our case &quot;natural&quot;. This really helps us empathise and understand on a deep level what is truly important to the other even when we are very different people in many ways; she an extrovert with less linguistic intelligence, and me more introverted with higher linguistic intelligence.  I see what you mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opposites may attract as some say but being cruious about someone who is very differnt than you are and becoming infatuated is much different than suggestng taht they would be a compatible mate.  Variety is good though.  Through our differences as lovers we can take each other to new places, expand our imaginations and the depth of our connections with each other.</p>
<p>As for same dominant intelligences being compatible, I would agree with you axinia.  You can add me and my wife to your list. And I think the reason may be in the ideals that our intelligence places the most value on, in our case &#8220;natural&#8221;. This really helps us empathise and understand on a deep level what is truly important to the other even when we are very different people in many ways; she an extrovert with less linguistic intelligence, and me more introverted with higher linguistic intelligence.  I see what you mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharad Bapat</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-16265</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharad Bapat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-16265</guid>
		<description>Interesting...

What happened to the theory &quot;Opposites attract&quot;.

Even my personal experience suggest that people having same level of leading intelligence coexists better.

On a funny note: we should ask couples to take the intelligence test before marriage. :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;</p>
<p>What happened to the theory &#8220;Opposites attract&#8221;.</p>
<p>Even my personal experience suggest that people having same level of leading intelligence coexists better.</p>
<p>On a funny note: we should ask couples to take the intelligence test before marriage. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axinia</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-16260</link>
		<dc:creator>axinia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-16260</guid>
		<description>I see your point, Nita!
But I have a feeling that it may necesserely be the leading type of Inteligence, lay be one of the leading ones...May be his second or third type is linguisitc ? Your yours spatial? :)

Or may be your couple is an exseption that certifies the rule??
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point, Nita!<br />
But I have a feeling that it may necesserely be the leading type of Inteligence, lay be one of the leading ones&#8230;May be his second or third type is linguisitc ? Your yours spatial? <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Or may be your couple is an exseption that certifies the rule??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nita</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-16259</link>
		<dc:creator>Nita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-16259</guid>
		<description>Axinia, if you are speaking of the level of intelligence I agree, it has some corelation. But I don&#039;t think type of intelligence matters so much as long as one can communicate. For example my husband is high in spatial intelligence and its a huge help when finding places! If both of us were poor in spatial intelligence it would definitely have been a problem! :) So in a way I think its nature&#039;s way of getting us together!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Axinia, if you are speaking of the level of intelligence I agree, it has some corelation. But I don&#8217;t think type of intelligence matters so much as long as one can communicate. For example my husband is high in spatial intelligence and its a huge help when finding places! If both of us were poor in spatial intelligence it would definitely have been a problem! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  So in a way I think its nature&#8217;s way of getting us together!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axinia</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-16258</link>
		<dc:creator>axinia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-16258</guid>
		<description>Nita, thanks!
That is only my personal obseration :)
But if you take my husband and me - we are quite opposite in so many ways, however we found out that we both have the linguistic intelligence, I was really surprised. But then I realised that the palying with words makes a huge part of our interactions... Then I noticed the same with other couples.

Surely it does not explain everyhting, but can work for many. I guss we are also not that much aware of our intelligence (like everyone suspected me being &quot;picture smart&quot;, but this is actually not my leading intellingence. Developed, yes, but not the leading one.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nita, thanks!<br />
That is only my personal obseration <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
But if you take my husband and me &#8211; we are quite opposite in so many ways, however we found out that we both have the linguistic intelligence, I was really surprised. But then I realised that the palying with words makes a huge part of our interactions&#8230; Then I noticed the same with other couples.</p>
<p>Surely it does not explain everyhting, but can work for many. I guss we are also not that much aware of our intelligence (like everyone suspected me being &#8220;picture smart&#8221;, but this is actually not my leading intellingence. Developed, yes, but not the leading one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nita</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-16257</link>
		<dc:creator>Nita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-16257</guid>
		<description>Interesting for me as I am a fan of Gardner and have reviewed one of his books. However I personally do not think its related to happiness in marriage. I think opposites can attract and in fact often complement each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting for me as I am a fan of Gardner and have reviewed one of his books. However I personally do not think its related to happiness in marriage. I think opposites can attract and in fact often complement each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supposition: why multiple intelligence theory is vital for a happy marriage &#171; 1000petals</title>
		<link>http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/supposition-how-multiple-intelligence-theory-is-vital-for-a-happy-marriage/#comment-16255</link>
		<dc:creator>Supposition: why multiple intelligence theory is vital for a happy marriage &#171; 1000petals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaktipower.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-16255</guid>
		<description>[...] This is a cross-post from my Shaktipower Blog, the supposition itself you will find here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a cross-post from my Shaktipower Blog, the supposition itself you will find here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
